From 0ed16a34ad6d052d6d3c5440b938c8856df001c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vivien Maisonneuve <v.maisonneuve@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 08:41:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix function name in doc comment

---
 src/validation.rs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/validation.rs b/src/validation.rs
index 11d48aa..efe3770 100644
--- a/src/validation.rs
+++ b/src/validation.rs
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ impl Validation {
 
     /// Which claims are required to be present for this JWT to be considered valid.
     /// The only values that will be considered are "exp", "nbf", "aud", "iss", "sub".
-    /// The simple usage is `set_required_claims(&["exp", "nbf"])`.
+    /// The simple usage is `set_required_spec_claims(&["exp", "nbf"])`.
     /// If you want to have an empty set, do not use this function - set an empty set on the struct
     /// param directly.
     pub fn set_required_spec_claims<T: ToString>(&mut self, items: &[T]) {