--- layout: single title: "Luau Recap: November 2022" --- While the team is busy to bring some bigger things in the future, we have made some small improvements this month. [Cross-posted to the [Roblox Developer Forum](https://devforum.roblox.com/t/luau-recap-november-2022/).] ## Analysis improvements We have improved tagged union type refinements to only include unhandled type cases in the `else` branch of the `if` statement: ```lua type Ok = { tag: "ok", value: T } type Err = { tag: "error", msg: string } type Result = Ok | Err function unwrap(r: Result): T? if r.tag == "ok" then return r.value else -- Luau now understands that 'r' here can only be the 'Err' part print(r.msg) return nil end end ``` For better inference, we updated the definition of `Enum.SomeType:GetEnumItems()` to return `{Enum.SomeType}` instead of common `{EnumItem}` and the return type of `next` function now includes the possibility of key being `nil`. Finally, if you use `and` operator on non-boolean values, `boolean` type will no longer be added by the type inference: ```lua local function f1(a: number?) -- 'x' is still a 'number?' and doesn't become 'boolean | number' local x = a and 5 end ``` ## Error message improvements We now give an error when built-in types are being redefined: ```lua type string = number -- Now an error: Redefinition of type 'string' ``` We also had a parse error missing in case you forgot your default type pack parameter value. We accepted the following code silently without raising an issue: ```lua type Foo = nil -- Now an error: Expected type, got '>' ``` Error about function argument count mismatch no longer points at the last argument, but instead at the function in question. So, instead of: ```lua function myfunction(a: number, b:number) end myfunction(123) ~~~ ``` We now highlight this: ```lua function myfunction(a: number, b:number) end myfunction(123) ~~~~~~~~~~ ``` If you iterate over a table value that could also be `nil`, you get a better explanation in the error message: ```lua local function f(t: {number}?) for i,v in t do -- Value of type {number}? could be nil --... end end ``` Previously it was `Cannot call non-function {number}?` which was confusing. And speaking of confusing, some of you might have seen an error like `Type 'string' could not be converted into 'string'`. This was caused by Luau having both a primitive type `string` and a table type coming from `string` library. Since the way you can get the type of the `string` library table is by using `typeof(string)`, the updated error message will mirror that and report `Type 'string' could not be converted into 'typeof(string)'`. Parsing now recovers with a more precise error message if you forget a comma in table constructor spanning multiple lines: ```lua local t = { a = 1 b = 2 -- Expected ',' after table constructor element c = 3 -- Expected ',' after table constructor element } ```